Blog: A Strong Case for Private Credit


In the latter half of 2022 and into 2023, capital flew in droves to money markets and short term treasuries as higher than expected inflation forced the Fed to invert the yield curve with a round of historically sharp interest rate hikes, pushing the short rate (SOFR) to 22 year highs.


Although inflation was largely an issue of constrained supply with lingering COVID-19 supply chain issues, the Fed needed to act in response to pressure so they could satisfy expectations. This move effectively bankrupted the banking system because prior to covid, the FEDs sentiment and telepathy was low sustainable 2% inflation and low rates to stay along with it. In response, banks and various companies in the business of producing safe returns to meet financial obligations were encouraged to invest/lend long in search of bonuses and yield spread. Unfortunately, not many of them hedged their interest rate risk.


The sudden increase in risk-free rates of return are throwing equity markets for a spin, sucking liquidity out of the banking system, and threatening risk asset values as well as fixed income alike.


Increasing risk-free yields are putting upward pressure on existing variable loan servicing costs through higher annual debt servicing, stressing real estate free cashflow, (variable loans are priced at a spread over the SOFR index), and they are also forcing investors to scrutinize their yield & growth expectations. Ultimately, cap rates are expected to expand to meet the risk-reward expectations in the market. How much they will expand, if any, is a function of capital flows and future growth expectations. This comes at a time when inflation is putting upward pressure on operational expenses such as taxes, insurance, energy, utilities, precious metals, and labor.


The resulting effect? Decreased NOI, lower property values, and a large disconnect between buyers and sellers. In many primary, secondary, and tertiary growth markets, expense growth has outpaced revenue growth year over year and threatens to do so through 2025 based on forecasted growth outlooks in select markets. Several Apartment REITS have reported lower than expected Q3 earnings due to revenue and expense pressures suppressing net income growth. On average, NOI across $100B of major apartment REIT values has missed projections by 28%.

The body content of your post goes here. To edit this text, click on it and delete this default text and start typing your own or paste your own from a different source.

Source: CRE Analyst


Investors who put bridge debt on assets in 2021 are under immense pressure to takeout their loans that are coming due this year and next. Given that NOI is down and cap rates are up, it is becoming increasingly hard to refinance these loans without the borrowers infusing cash into deals. Over the last decade, investors became accustomed to cash-out refinances, in which new loan proceeds exceeded that of the old loan amount, creating equity and value for partners. With interest rates climbing and threatening to remain elevated, we may see a wave of deals whose NOI are not high enough to support leverage that exceeds principal loan balances.


Multifamily values have come down from their peak, anywhere from 15-25%, depending on the market, asset class, and property level grade + characteristics. But since the private market and real estate in general is relatively illiquid, sellers can hold to prevent portfolio mark-downs and losses, just as long as they have good debt. The public REI market trades based on expectations and given its liquid nature, it tends to be a forward looking indicator for the private real estate markets.

In almost all of 2021, SOFR remained at 0% and the 10 year hovered under 1.5% for the majority of the year. Core, new multifamily assets in growth primaries traded as low at 3.25-3.5% cap rates.


Fast forward to 2023, and SOFR stands tall at 5.3% while the 10 year stands at 4.63%, an exorbitant increase, the sharpest rise in multiple decades. This increase in debt capital helps explain why sellers are not meeting the value expectations of current buyers in the marketplace. Buyers are underwriting to a much higher weighted average cost of capital, and sellers are in denial when you tell pricing is down 15% + from their expectations just months ago.

In time of value uncertainty, it pays to move down in the capital stack. Defensive positioning can help insure capital remains hedged from material swings in value, holding its value until the market heads back up. The chart below illustrates the changes in capital financing and return requirements, as well as leverage demands.

In the chart above, you can assume that the first position loan is a bridge loan. Once the Fed raised the short-term interest rate in one of the fast rate hiking accelerations in history, values began to wither, leverage receded, and equity became more hawkish. Weighted average costs of capital increased, putting pressure on free cashflow, valuations, and newly sized loan proceeds.

2021 rewarded investors for taking on more risk, sitting in a common equity position. It was common to see 15-20%+ annualized returns for vintage multifamily deals bought at reasonable prices and resold or flipped 2-3 years later. Many of these properties produced even higher equity returns, producing MOICs of 2-4x in less than 3 years. A combination of compressed cap rates and historically high rent growth produced these returns.


In 2023, case dependent, investors can command equity-like returns for debt-like risk, sitting in a preferred equity position in the stack. Similarly, senior first position lenders can command equity like yield while receiving a higher margin of safety on their leverage position. This capital stack dislocation became larger as debt-capital from banks dried up, and its expected to get even worse, leaving a gap and opportunity for those that are able to see it. Equity has to offset the decrease in leverage, hurting projected returns on much larger tranches of equity, driving yield expectations up even higher and pressuring values.


The risk-reward ratio largely favors credit or preferred equity in this environment because investors can earn a higher return for much less risk. We call this asymmetric, meaning, your potential for upside is higher than your risk of downside.

Historically, debt is uncorrelated to the value of the underlying real estate itself, as shown in the image below. AEG believes that debt and preferred equity is the most attractive vehicle at this point in the market cycle; although, equity opportunities are just starting to be compelling.


Once the market has confidence in future inflation, then it can rely on a terminal rate in order to confidently move forward with trades. Real estate transactions rely on an efficient and liquid banking system to function - & when debt dries up, appraisers and buyers alike cannot rely on prior trades to establish values... and lenders are not issuing any favorable term sheets either with deteriorating property and capital market level fundamentals. The result is a chain-effect of pressure build up.


Since bank debt issuance is a function of healthy collateral and reliable markets, we are likely to continue to see turbulence until something breaks or the Fed lowers rates. Until/if then, it will pay off to be lower in the capital stack as investors look for alternative debt solutions to fill the gap left by traditional lenders.

By Christian O'Neal July 31, 2025
Why Building and Holding Real Estate for the Long- Term Delivers Superior, Tax-Efficient Yield 
By Christian O'Neal July 31, 2025
Rent Control: A Well-Intentioned Policy That Misses the Mark In the debate over affordable housing, few policies stir as much emotion—or controversy—as rent control. Advocates see it as a way to shield tenants from rising rents. Critics argue it does more harm than good. When you examine the economic evidence and real- world outcomes, the conclusion becomes clear: rent control is a deeply flawed solution to a real problem. What Is Rent Control? Rent control is a policy that limits how much landlords can increase rent, either through caps tied to inflation or fixed annual percentages. On paper, it sounds compassionate: protect renters from displacement and make cities more affordable. But in practice, rent control reduces the supply of available housing, discourages new development, and often hurts the very people it's meant to help. Why Rent Control Backfires 1. It Discourages New Construction Developers are less likely to build in markets where future rent growth—and thus returns—are capped. Why take the risk of developing multifamily housing in a city where your upside is limited and your operating environment is politicized? 2. It Drives Property Owners Out of the Market Faced with strict rent regulations, landlords may convert rental units to condos or remove them from the market altogether. Fewer units mean more scarcity, which ultimately drives prices higher for everyone else. 3. It Distorts Housing Allocation Rent control encourages long-term tenants to stay in apartments they might otherwise outgrow or vacate. This locks up valuable housing stock and prevents more dynamic turnover, often freezing lower-cost units in place for higher-income tenants. 4. It Creates a Two-Tiered Market Markets with rent control often develop into two separate ecosystems: regulated apartments that are underpriced and hard to find, and unregulated units with inflated prices to compensate for suppressed supply. The California–New York Split: A Tale of Two Approaches Historically, California and New York have been peers in over-regulating rental housing. But recently, they’ve taken different paths: California's Recent Steps Forward:  Voters rejected rent control expansion (Prop 21 and earlier Prop 10)  Streamlined approvals and reduced CEQA abuse to promote new development New York's Recent Moves Backward:  Passed “Good Cause Eviction” law—effectively rent control in disguise  Political calls for rent freezes and demonization of landlords If you’re an open-minded apartment developer evaluating both markets today, California’s message is increasingly: We need you. New York’s? Not so much. To be fair, both are still difficult places to build housing, and cities like Los Angeles and Berkeley remain deeply anti-development. But California has shown progress by recognizing that you can’t claim to be pro-housing while simultaneously vilifying those who create and operate it. A Misalignment of Incentives A core problem with rent control is that it treats housing supply as fixed and ignores the private sector's role in expanding it. If developers and operators are stripped of potential upside—and burdened with unpredictable political risk—they simply stop building. Even well-intentioned pro-development plans (like NYC’s "City oare undermined when operators believe they’ll be punished after delivery through hostile regulation or public scorn. You can't be truly pro-development unless you're also pro-operator. Policies that foster collaboration, not scapegoating, create the conditions for long-term affordability. The Real Way Forward Instead of imposing artificial caps, cities should focus on increasing housing supply through zoning reform, expedited approvals, and public-private partnerships. The more units that come online, the more pricing power shifts away from landlords and toward tenants—naturally. Rent control is seductive in its simplicity but devastating in its consequences. It’s a policy that tries to solve a supply problem with demand-side restrictions—and in doing so, it often makes things worse. At Alpha Equity Group, we believe that smart, sustainable development is the key to housing affordability. And that requires sound economics, not political theater.
By Christian O'Neal June 24, 2025
In the world of capital markets, clarity is often fleeting — and today, it feels downright elusive. The Federal Reserve’s latest June dot plot offered little in the way of certainty. While the median projection sees the Federal Funds Rate in the mid-3% range by the end of 2026 , the dispersion among voting members is striking. Seven members predict no rate cuts in 2024 , reflecting just how divided the committee remains in the face of conflicting data. This latest update marks a 25-50 basis point shift downward from May , but the overarching theme is one of caution, not conviction. That sentiment is mirrored in the economic projections. Core PCE inflation , the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, is now expected to end 2025 at 3.0% , 30 basis points higher than earlier forecasts. Meanwhile, real GDP is forecast to slow from 2.3% in Q4 2024 to just 1.7% in 2025 — another sign that the lagged effects of monetary policy are expected to begin to show. At the same time, the Fed’s balance sheet has shrunk dramatically, from a peak of $9 trillion in April 2022 to just $2.3 trillion today . That quantitative tightening, coupled with a lack of consistent inflation suppression, leaves both equity and bond markets vulnerable to further volatility. This all feeds into an uncomfortable truth: rates are likely to remain higher for longer , and the market is struggling to price that reality. The VIX index , a 30-day forward-looking gauge of volatility in equities, is trending higher. When volatility rises even as indices fall, credit spreads widen , liquidity tightens, and financing risk surges. For commercial real estate investors , this has enormous implications. As we explored in our recent article on CRE Price Discovery , the market remains in flux. The bid-ask spread in real estate is still somewhat wide, and most transaction activity today is being driven by maturing debt — not opportunistic investments banking on future growth. This means valuations are being forced downward, especially for assets that were purchased or refinanced at ultra-low rates in 2021–2022. Consumer behavior is also in transition. Household formation is slowing, and personal savings rates are slowly ticking up although they are significantly down from longer term averages – which could reflect folks bracing for economic turbulence. U.S. household formation currently stands at 1.058 million, down 7.68% from last month’s 1.146 million and down 47.73% from 2.024 million a year ago. Looking globally, demand for U.S. Treasuries remains a critical economic indicator that has trickling effects on the economy . A strong bid-to-cover ratio — like the 2.67x seen at the June 11th 10-Year Treasury auction , with nearly 88% of bids from foreign banks — is encouraging. It suggests continued faith in U.S. fiscal credibility and currency strength despite market apprehensions in our strength, such as the US credit rating being downgraded by Moody’s. This equilibrium is rather fragile. Should the U.S. continue to run massive budget deficits with a debt-to-GDP ratio north of 120% , investors may begin to demand higher yields — or worse, seek refuge in alternative stores of value. Gold is one such store. The World Gold Council recently reported that 76% of central banks expect to increase their gold holdings over the next five years , up from 69% in 2023. This flight to real assets reflects growing concern about the long-term value of fiat currencies — and a desire to hedge against systemic risk. The Bottom Line  Rates are likely to remain high through 2025 and into 2026 Inflation remains persistent but progress has been unclear Growth is slowing, and volatility is rising Real estate is repricing around debt maturity events Global capital is shifting cautiously, looking for safety At Alpha Equity Group, we believe this is a time for discipline, not risk-taking. We’re staying patient, watching the data, and investing defensively — focusing on secured debt positions and capital preservation. While others chase uncertain upside, we’re building long-term value through downside protection while we wait out the convergence of dozens of factors completely outside our control.
Show More